This is an attempt at rewriting the rclone filter documentation page.
I have drawn largely from what appears to be the strong original
structure of the page; existing text, and forum comments.
The term flag is used throughout rather than differentiating `--`
options with more complex arguments. That diverges from some standard
practice but is consistent with messages in the rclone binary and `go`
documentation.
The term directory not folder is used throughout.
I tried referring to objects more broadly rather than files and it
just did not seem to work. Apart from a note at the top the
explanations refer entirely to paths, directories and files. My
justification is that bucket store users understand the concept of
files. Not all users of directory aware storage are so familiar with
objects, keys and metadata.
Many of the changes I have made involve moving issues into what seemed
to me to be more relevant parts of the original page structure. I
still find the content repetitious and overly long but that may be
inevitable when users can only be expected to read the section of the
page they think most relevant.
I have eliminated the rsync section from the original structure. It is
hard enough explaining how rclone filters work without also setting
out how they do not. Comment on sync is instead relegated to a
paragraph in the directory filter section.
The structure of the page is intended to work with a hugo toc card
from html Header2 to Header3.
My original intention was to establish a separate examples section. I
have instead retained examples in each section, added to them and
tried to make clear what is documentation and what example.
The changes draw on Github and Forum issues too numerous to mention.
for instance:
https://forum.rclone.org/t/certain-exclusion-flags-seem-to-be-ignored/20049/2
I am **especially** grateful for
https://forum.rclone.org/t/object-key-remote-directory-filter-clarification/20386/2
for making sense of directory filters for me.
@ncw has a fun (and useful) online filter app at
https://filterdemo.rclone.org/ I have not referred to it at this stage
though I particularly like the fact that it is tied to the same
codebase as an rclone version.
I have added cautions about mixing the `--filter...` flags with
`--exclude...` or `--include...`. The same issues seem to arise as
already recognised between the latter two.
The formal summary of glob syntax introduced at the top of the page is
shamelessly stolen from https://godoc.org/github.com/gobwas/glob
I have tried not to alter too many header descriptions and thereby
break existing links to them.
The reference to 'lass' in the example has been retained to confuse
all those not of Scottish or Yorkshire heritage.
Some of my activity was to remove ambiguity and I anticipate
suggestions to roll that back where it has become overly complex.
I tried particularly to bring together and make clear material about
directory filters. It was previously scattered throughout the page and
I couldn't understand it. I am particularly grateful for the
explanations I received about directory filters though any remaining
errors are entirely my own.
Removed erroneous references to non existent `--filter...` flags.
In some ways the best person to write this page would be one with no
knowledge whatsoever of how rclone filters work. The further I got
into it the better qualified I found myself to be.
E&OE
Create a full loop of documentation for rclone about, backends overview
and individual backend pages.
Discussion:
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/pull/4774 relates
Previously pull was requested, in part, under ref
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/pull/4801
Notes:
Introduce a tentative draft see-link format the end of sections to try
rather than lots of in-para links.
Update about.go incl link to list of backends not supporting about.
In list of backends not supporting about, include link to about command
reference.
I appreciate there may be decisions to make going forward about whether
command links should be code formatted, and using proper pretty url
links, but I have fudged that for now.
Update backend pages that do not support about with wording used
previously for ftp - it is in passive voice but I can live with it. (my
own wording and fault). The note is applied to a limitations section. If
one does not already exist it is created (even if there are other
limitations with their own sections)
The topic is mostly about so limitations so all of these are grouped together with a section hyperlink near the top of the page. Intention is to avoid potential duplication and make it more straightforward (there is a place and it is essentially just a list so wording doesn't need to be elegant) to add notes about limitations in future, harvested from rclone forum postings.
Minor wording alterations that do not intend to change meaning
Minor wording change to help for explicit and implicit FTPS flags. More consistent between flags. Add 's' to request because only one 'client' mentioned.
edwardxml